Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate possession of a firearm or ammunition solely because they crossed state lines at some point before they came into the defendant's possession.
(This question is already pending before this Court in Seekins v. United States, Case No. 22-6853. Ms. Gonzales requests that the Court hold this portion of her petition pending the disposition in Seekins.)
2. Whether, as a statutory matter, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) prohibits a person's present intrastate possession of a firearm or ammunition for the sole reason that the firearm or ammunition previously crossed state lines.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate possession of a firearm or ammunition solely because they crossed state lines at some point before they came into the defendant's possession
2023-07-07
Reply of petitioner Mary Gonzales filed. (Distributed)
2023-07-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-20
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-05-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 20, 2023. See Rule 30.1
2023-05-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 19, 2023 to June 19, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 19, 2023)
2023-03-08
Application (22A784) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until April 17, 2023.
2023-03-03
Application (22A784) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 16, 2023 to April 17, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.