No. 22-7288
Gilberto Gonzalez-Enriquez v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process error-calculation harmless-error judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-error sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review u.s-sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a sentencing court can insulate a substantial error in calculating the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range from appellate review simply by asserting that it would have imposed the same sentence "even if I had gotten the guideline range wrong."
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sentencing court can insulate a substantial error in calculating the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range from appellate review simply by asserting that it would have imposed the same sentence 'even if I had gotten the guideline range wrong'
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2023)
Attorneys
Gilberto Gonzalez-Enriquez
James Matthew Wright — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent