No. 22-7283
Ronald O. LaTray v. Pete Bludworth, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment habeas-corpus state-courts stone-v-powell
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2023-05-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
What constitutes a full and fair opportunity to litigate a United States Constitutional Fourth Amendment violation complaint invoking the exclusionary rule in States Courts?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What constitutes a full and fair opportunity to litigate a United States Constitutional Fourth Amendment violation complaint invoking the exclusionary rule in States Courts?
Docket Entries
2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-04-25
Waiver of right of respondent Pete Bludworth, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2023)
Attorneys
Pete Bludworth, Warden, et al.
Michael P. Dougherty — Montana Attorney's General Office, Respondent
Ronald LaTray
Ronald O. LaTray — Petitioner