No. 22-726

Alejandro Evaristo Perez v. LinkedIn Corporation

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: anti-slapp bioweapon-allegations civil-rights due-process free-speech judicial-misconduct pro-se rule-40 standing takings veterans veterans-rights
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

The original questions were "Whether the
excommunication of an Honorable US War Veteran (and
paying customer) by Fallen Federal Judges and unpatriotic
Corporatistas for the evil Chinese Communist Party is a
California Anti 'S LAPP violation or Federal Treason? And
how many thousands of Americans have to die from a CCP
bioweapon pandemic developed in the Wuhan P4 Virology
Center before Fallen Federal Judges acknowledge it as a
'Topic of Public Issue/Interest '? And did such suppression aid
the CCP 's bioweapon pandemic further infesting and killings
thousands of Americans? " Now, we have additional
questions before the US Supreme Court, because the original
questions were rejected in malice when Rule 40 (Veterans,
Seamen, and Military Cases) was violated when rejecting
multiple "Motion For Leave To Proceed As An Honorable Us
Veteran ". Additional questions arise like "Do we need
Martial Law to enforce Rule 40 and elected real Patriotic
Federal Judges via a bipartisan effort? "; "Why is the US
Supreme Court hating on US War Veterans and hating on
Rule 40?" ; "Why have the Fallen Judges and Traitors not
peacefully settle and simply accept the generous terms of
surrender? " The additional questions can only be answered
by US President Joseph Biden; and thus, the new questions
are technically out of the scope of the US Supreme Court.
Please note the US President Joseph Biden 's White House
has been informed of the Pro Se Party 's requests for Martial
After raising the settlement/damages/pardon to Law.
$256BN due to the multiple "Rule 40" insults, docket
mismanagement, many failed negotiations, and US Code
violations, the Pro Se Party (the Honorable US War Veteran,
and Honorable US Army Officer) presents the original
questions via this petition to the corrupted US Supreme
Court. What will the violators of Rule 40 have to say about
the original questions? Will they have a mighty revelation,
change of hearts, and finally apologize for over 2 years?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the excommunication of an Honorable US War Veteran (and paying customer) by Fallen Federal Judges and unpatriotic Corporatistas for the evil Chinese Communist Party is a California Anti'SLAPP violation or Federal Treason?

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2022-04-27

Attorneys

Alejandro E. Perez
Alejandro Evaristo Perez — Petitioner