Has Oregon's Judiciary and legislature failed to incorporate landmark cases relevant for how and-when to enhance a sentence, and to comport with the rule of Federal law? Is a Unanimous verdict of 12' votes and jury record a pre-condition and affirmance under the Federal United States Constitution, before an appellate and State Supreme Court declares an Opinion and dissent on Sixth Amendment Jury trial right sentencing errors harmless?

Are Judicial discretionary findings Are merger and non-merger and concurrent and consecutive allowed to aggravate a-sentence to each count beyond the maximum set by the statute under federallaw?

Does the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment provision of the United States protect a defendant from having any of his Jury trial Convictions to be included and counted into his criminal history score and from being subject to a higher recidivist sentence to each count?

For Purpose at the foregoing, on State Retion Liability, did the Appeltate Court correctly determmue the liability issees a Facts?

Has Oregon's Judiciary and legislature failed to incorporate landmark cases relevant for how and when to enhance a sentence, and to comport with the rule of Federal law?