No. 22-7246
Mikequale Miller v. Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc., et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-protection due-process gideon-v-wainwright pro-se-litigant products-liability standing strict-liability
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should a Pro Se Litigant in a products-liability case be given the same or similar Constitutional protection and liberties as Pro Se criminal defendants with the Court's insight and wisdom utilized in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 when he cannot afford counsel in a non-frivolous products-liability case involving strict liability?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a Pro Se Litigant in a products-liability case be given the same or similar Constitutional protection and liberties as Pro Se criminal defendants
Docket Entries
2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-04-24
Waiver of right of respondents Techtronic Industries Co, LTD, TTI Outdoor Power Equipment, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-04-17
Waiver of right of respondents Pep Boys, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Mikequale Miller
Mikequale Miller — Petitioner
Pep Boys, et al.
John J. Hare — Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman and Goggin, Respondent
Techtronic Industries Co, LTD, TTI Outdoor Power Equipment, Inc.
Terese Marie Fennell — Seeley Savidge Ebert & Gourash, Respondent