No. 22-7241
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-statute due-process facial-challenge first-amendment free-speech statutory-interpretation vagueness vagueness-doctrine
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Salerno's "no set of circumstances" test, the Hoffman/Grayned "more stringent vagueness test," or some other test, should govern judicial review of vagueness challenges to statutes that criminalize First Amendment-protected speech.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Salerno's 'no set of circumstances' test, the Hoffman/Grayned 'more stringent vagueness test,' or some other test, should govern judicial review of vagueness challenges to statutes that criminalize First-Amendment-protected-speech
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent State Utah to respond filed.
2023-04-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 8, 2023)
2023-02-22
Application (22A765) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until April 2, 2023.
2023-02-20
Application (22A765) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 2, 2023 to May 1, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Eric Matthew Ray
Gene Clayton Schaerr — Schaerr | Jaffe, Petitioner
State Utah
Karen A. Klucznik — Utah Attorney General's Office, Respondent