No. 22-7212
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-due-process court-review due-process habeas-corpus judicial-interpretation legal-discretion pluralist-rule standing statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court erred in dismissing a pro se petition asserting a plausible claim of actual innocence without requiring a response from the state and without considering the 'ends of justice' or 'equitable tolling' exceptions to the statute of limitations defense
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2023-07-12
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-22
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2023-06-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2022-10-07
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 4, 2023)
Attorneys
Solomon Roberts
Solomon Roberts — Petitioner