1. Did the North Carolina State Superior Court deny this
Petitioner actual justice in the face of established
State laws allowing the filing of a second Motion
For Appropriate Relief (MAR), demonstrating violations
of Petitioners Constitutional Rights to a fair and
impartial trial?

2. Can the protections afforded and guaranteed by Petitioner's
United States Constitutional Rights to the effective
assistance of counsel be omitted and disregarded by the
lower State Court in essence to state laws that should
be voided for vagueness?

Did the North Carolina State Superior Court deny this Petitioner actual justice in the face of established 'State laws allowing the filing of a second Motion For Appropriate Relief (MAR), demonstrating violations of Petitioners Constitutional Rights to a fair and impartial trial?