(1) Under categorical approach, is 18 USC § 924(c)'s residual clause held as unconstitutionally vague, and predicated by Conspiracy to Commit Hobbs Act Robbery?

(2) Does multiple counts of 18 USC § 1246's on a single indictment, all charged for the same conduct, constitute unconstitutional practice of stacking?

(3) Has reason for a procedure of search and seizure been presented if prosecution failed to produce under Fed. R. Crim. P. Rule 16, the testimony of the law enforcement officer who initially engaged in the search and seizure conducted?

(4) Does a defense counsel's disregard for proceedings and course of action on grounds relevant for objection to prosecution constitute Ineffective Assistance of Counsel?

(5) Does the District Court abuse its discretion if courts failed to prevent Ineffective Assistance of Counsel toward defendant, upon defendant's 41 notices to the courts of counsel's ineffectiveness?

(6) Would deprivation of a defendant's due process restraint on proceedings to course of action, add burden on defendant's right to privilege against self-incrimination and voluntariness of defendant's plea?

Whether the appellant's conviction for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery does not constitute a crime of violence predicate under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)