No. 22-7166
Anthony H. Warnick v. Steven Harpe, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
IFP
Tags: aedpa antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act civil-procedure due-process judicial-precedent jurisdictional-challenge subject-matter-jurisdiction supreme-court tenth-circuit
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-06-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can subject matter jurisdiction be raised at any time? I.
Is an issue of subject-matter jurisdiction subject to the one-year limitation II.
proscribed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) as held
by the Tenth Circuit?
III. Do unpublished opinions supersede decades of published Supreme Court precedent
as recently used by the Tenth Circuit?
Is due-process circumvented by the AEDPA? IV.
Is a judgment entered by a court which is void of subject-matter jurisdiction a valid V.
and lawful judgment as recently held by the Tenth Circuit?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can subject matter jurisdiction be raised at any time?
Docket Entries
2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2023)
2023-01-31
Application (22A688) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until April 2, 2023.
2023-01-19
Application (22A688) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 1, 2023 to April 2, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Anthony H. Warnick
Anthony H. Warnick — Petitioner