1. Whether Rule 3:21-10(b) authorizes a reviewing court to reconsider a sentence based upon post-conviction rehabilitative efforts pursuant to establish case law and statute?

2. Whether the State Court decisions were contrary to the following cases, statutes: Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010); Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. (2012); United States v. Sally, 116 F.3d 76 (3rd Cir. 1997); State v. Case, 220 N.J. 49 (2014); State v. Jaffe, 220 N.J. 114 (2014) and N.J.S.A. 2C:1-2(b)(2)?

3. Whether or not New Jersey Court Rule 3:21-10(b) is Unconstitutional as it does not provide an actual subsection that allows a proper review of Post-conviction rehabilitative efforts even if a Appellant's Motion is not preceded by a remand?

Whether Rule 3:21-10(b) authorizes a reviewing court to reconsider a sentence based upon post-conviction rehabilitative efforts