Denzel Simmons v. Mike Walczak, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
1) Musk MESimamens conchors fer assaul voitn intenb te ou Ader and LAorions. assaull le vacated because ray, are nck supported. by soPhiciend eindence Strom sri & feasandde Ker could determine. beyond 8 tessondble, dodok trek. he posesed Ye requisite wienk eo conamit a Yonge Sfenae. EnsoMicient endence of whent to Mill also guilly verdict a fax ane \ogacally Gxclode gplk on dhe. We
2) Was Mr. Simenenss mandatery guidelines eninimym Sentencing renge mpc by dudcad feck Koding wela\ion ot Yne Sith henend?
3) WSS proscevter's miscondods viclaton of Sart \ra)\, frend on Me coort, \iplakion of CP and WW amenimerta?
4) OAs meffeckwe assistance & ols Atal. and appellate coonse) wipiakion of 476) TAA" Amendments?
5) Ls WeSinmorss fights speedy Wa vislded? dormel a Sek Magnmen?
6) Pusaa dr. Semmongs cannelions in viclakon of double Jeopardy?
7) Was Ahe doty inplochonS wrptopex?
8) Was. Ane Dekrork Police Degartment. Sime. Cepors WALOTISOSSDA
9) Did the Deltoik cramecclice report prove Sraudon. Ye. ceourk!
10) tid the Uriled Stakes Appeal coork of the Sith crcurk Fellow FRAP 35@),40@ since deagien was mailed.to MeSimmors, did Whey gue. am addihional Ynree days under rule 2600) fer ns molion under 596), OWS vat suggestion of rehearing en-banc,and did the coork uplold coord olydays onder nck 8.11208) beSer. tolirg, nckon onmely?
11) was dorors 8,9, 15 aeEB biase?
12) wos he duty. gen the ustong, oath. late? nents ey weit varie
13) vom all the offenete.. gen Yhe. sarne elements once the court Aveda of them. together. onder elements. of Aiding and. .Mekling:
14) tid T. have the ngrk to Fol discovery?
15) did L have Ahe tight to five my layer?
16) Ded the Lockridge Temand have te fellow the Howerd Stendared?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED