No. 22-7153

Tamar Devell Harvey v. Frederick Russell, Assistant Warden

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bodily-harm civil-rights deliberate-indifference due-process eighth-amendment inmate-safety prison-official prison-officials risk-of-serious-harm substantial-risk
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

How can the district court say I failed to state a Claim against Conner when suit never said that suit personally handed my grievance to Conner said that suit worked 0 of #019 without the Security at the inmate A were prison official hash of those officials Question for

The question under the Eighth Amendment is whether Conner a Prison official acted with deliberate indifference exposed Hardin to a sufficient substantial risk of serious damage to his future health health safety or

On July 31 Son did Conner ignore a major risk to Hardin

Question fifth

What didn't Conner formally hand Hardin in face to confer Prison officials if she knew there she was going to take enduring actions after being his notices in empty offices

On Outabon following Conners actions was I failed exposure to those Unreasonable risk of serious bodily harm unconstitutional

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's claim for failure to state a claim

Docket Entries

2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-14
Waiver of right of respondent Frederick Russell, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2023)

Attorneys

Frederick Russell, et al.
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Tamar Devell Harvey
Tamar Devell Harvey — Petitioner