No. 22-7148
Karteu Omar Jenkins v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (9)IFP
Tags: acquitted-conduct criminal-procedure drug-weight-calculation due-process fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel sentencing sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2023-06-29
(distributed 9 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN NOT APPOINTING NEW
COUNSEL AFTER THE SECOND HEARING ON THIS MATTER?
II. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN NOT APPOINTING NEW
COUNSEL AFTER THE SECOND HEARING ON THE MATTER?
III. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT VIOLATED MR. JENKINS ' FIFTH
AND SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WHEN IT BASED ITS DRUG
WEIGHT CALCULATIONS ON ACQUITTED CONDUCT?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in not appointing new counsel after the second hearing on the matter?
Docket Entries
2023-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-09
Rescheduled.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-07
Rescheduled.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Karteu Jenkins
Karteu Omar Jenkins — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent