No. 22-7115
Imre Kifor v. Massachusetts, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: child-support-enforcement congressional-research-service constitutional-challenge constitutional-interpretation federal-matching-grant federal-reimbursement federal-reimbursements open-ended-program reimbursement-rate state-matching-grant
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
In the context of the federal CSE 1 reimbursement program, the Massachusetts
Legislature enacted an ambiguous interpretation 2 by implying a possible spectrum
for the rate of reimbursements 3. Is the "open-ended " and thus manipulatable
federal program constitutional as currently practiced by Massachusetts?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
In the context of the federal CSE reimbursement program, is the 'open-ended' and thus manipulatable federal program constitutional as currently practiced by Massachusetts?
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-03-30
Waiver of right of respondents Massachusetts, et al. to respond filed.
2023-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Imre Kifor
Imre Kifor — Petitioner
Massachusetts, et al.