No. 22-7114
Miguel Ortiz-Castillo v. United States
Tags: alleyne almendarez-torres appellate-procedure apprendi constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-interpretation precedent-analysis sentencing supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183)
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-26
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-04-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 26, 2023.
2023-04-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 26, 2023 to May 26, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Miguel Ortiz-Castillo
Judy Fulmer Madewell — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent