Since In re Marriage of Guinn, 93 P.3d 568 (Colo. App. 2004) was/is (strictly) a "division of marital property " case (governed by "Title 14. Domestic Matters (§§ 14-1- 101 to 14-15-119), Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) (2022 )") - and this case is a "testamentary trust " case (governed by "Title 15. Probate, Trusts, and Fiduciaries ((§§ 15-1-101 — 15-23-122), C.R.S. (2022) ") - did the Colorado Court of Appeals commit "reversible error " when it applied "division of marital property " law (under Title 14, C.R.S. (2022)) to this case?

Based upon the holdings in NC DEPT. OF REV v. KIM RICEKAESTNER 1992 TRUST [KAESTNER] case, did the Colorado Court of Appeals commit "reversible error " when it applied "division of marital property " law (under Title 14, C.R.S. (2022)) to this case and ruled that "...Cole hasn 't established any constitutional deprivation. He doesn 't have a property interest in the undistributed funds from the trust "?

Based upon the holdings in KAESTNER, what "constitutional rights " do "trust beneficiaries " have in their "equitable interests " in (inherited) "monies " - from ("probated ") "Last Wills and Testaments " - which are held in "testamentary trusts " for the "benefit " of "trust beneficiaries "?

If the Colorado Court of Appeals did not commit "reversible error " in this case, do "trust beneficiaries " have ("legal " and/or "equitable ") "standing " to "protect " their "equitable interests " in (inherited) "monies " - from ("probated ") "Last Wills and Testaments " - which are held in "testamentary trusts " for their "benefit(s) " as "trust beneficiaries "?

Whether the Colorado Court of Appeals committed reversible error by applying division-of-marital-property law to a testamentary-trust case