No. 22-71
Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Response Waived
Tags: appeal-prematurity civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-findings due-process individual-rights judicial-procedure judicial-procedures legal-review procedural-error standing
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
The first question presented is whether a lower court erred in correctly finding appeal premature, but then attempting to make findings relative to the premature appeal.
The second question presented is whether existing judicial procedures are adequate to protect individual constitutional rights.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a lower court erred in finding an appeal premature, but then attempting to make findings relative to the premature appeal
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2021-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Jerald Hammann
Jerald A. Hammann — Petitioner
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Kristina H. Kaluza — Dykema Gossett, PLLC, Respondent