I Mo/io/l for Jcojul tt<sL se -L^/^ /a/SuffideA
&\)'ic/ertC& ~bo Gubsid tkce^Se to Jit/y.

Xj (beard i To nKeUs TesiL /f\Ony Should sv&t bs^ (bets (sllou>ed
aba Se- o-f d / Sore^tlos ) bRB rule- ?0 7(b) Jucfee- Mikes-
SeUd toskel usr-S claj expert a/^der D^ki because 'Coa Uei
testified ijj be\ o<?u,rf o^d ^dAs -to Afel testified $ he Sad
S)he uue^ Testified i/u federal a#aft he-fofC .as SS

3, Go- (U/dot ^Ijnstuft uJc5 forjedos a CmSest to COn-
- Tin U0l ^Ate. ck-%\ cL uj^S cl^Pr\\Jed of a S pe&dy
f Hj A /V)lShnaL Should bsi/t- hoes $/as bed a>kes fu rncroaS
IrtctiVlotU't-L's u>e*.ri/LC \Je$tS S^y<V^ <(6iKerS c-f^-nSi ch:iJ
\ CKbute^ Ait ez\cted t/le /lidded to CCflaA Uj!t/i£SSeSj
! /w (lied c^f&vwd tke Ceaftf'oos' okJ it$ en<J (ppA$'
£>J Gallardo auS deprived of h'i$ flgki io testify ,

! b>}Tke Ind/Ctmest aai oief^ot]\!t \a tk^t It failed to
Stale' t Uat & all oudo iS IncTcvd c^d Hi$ Correct a
G«,ll&sda'$ |/t$rt ruction on Sp&o\TiC intent <sS Proposed
Shou-r /d tosi/c begirt G■> f d.

[ Sy Judfit- Vibes denied Jaror^ recced {o lesi/z cud $ad yoa
u/ed \AAot levu/c t,l( tke/e ,s a aA^rtmas cd-cc-iSo/a,

Whether the district court abused its discretion in admitting Tonkel's testimony under FRE 807(b)