Whether Lack Of Territorial Jurisdiction has been exercised by "Senio Jurs" Unauthing it "Chief Judsere" Judicial -powers to Appoint a "Magistnate unst" under 28 U.S.c.3636 ()(0), (e)(2) a())?

Whether Iacr "Govrnmlal Fmplogels her "Constrne CEnTN FnuMRTNs fr (Pron g. Pctong Prisorn) to Dene" them their Constitutional Right (under the 9th AMENDMENT")?

HEtHEn - The (ReSpndenls) etal "FecurINs The ShelrenNs NHows Poi Ction" from the Virgma Jeportment of Contion to plae (Pog Ptdop into a Hosig Unit A Multiple Houing Cell with."Knox-NLie FunGr Fon 1 5 MN I CELN-UnUA PuNENuode the 8h "AMENOMENT")?

HETHET Federal"Ru 24 (a-62-2 0f Cun Procedue SHAl permt (Pro ge Petitoner to "TNrEnvENe INto Oren INDEPENDANT ONGOTNG CI ATTONG N- ApPEAL" to aSSE Caims -- eritc of "ansans RertattaNsy " unden 42 U.5.6.32982 (0-2 32983 3 1985(3), 0nd 31997 ?

HETHEN Th "JENTA DF TNJUNCION BELEE" by the Iauen"Federa Courtes resulted into the "nNfcessarr st or Jeno Fonce " aganst Pro ge Pothoner inder 1 8 U.5.c.33626(a)(2)AandB(-)?

AHEHE "SunEy" Cot "RuG" 16. 2 and 17.1 "Mu" be a I nepindant n Adequate Remedy far " Cobcuesron NGnANrNe PerrIoNG"far(Pro-ge Peditionr agunst a

Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioners' claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim