1. Does petitioner have the right to have his patrons heaped and his allegations disputed by Respondents?

2. Should there Bank on £ then Writ -#e7t/ pow TUN Key) ave. admavestery/ orden e AN X-RAY (Caner D0 ef Av6) do hefecmne 1A hebrawer hae Any broken lowes? WAS Lats deliberate inh Keeace?

3. Does petitioner have the waht to be fo unvol ge lty "y A uty He his peees witar?

4. Sven lays eR The (Pecleant S eedly +e net) OR, can felt Com Shoe er . Dept detarpw AW move cent ofRartee Chitaged wiih A Crime a AN ineclore Removal Amount of— time, # \V thot dai?

5. Does fetter have protectron agin S}— , LN ReaSonmb|(e searches owol se; zuces ra Polece Offrue per his US. G@NST Amend wer

6. Does fetitrower ejay the US. Cons7? sp menT Unht do bear aaa OND Amend men T (Uy (R- AINS |

7. Dee Ss Fe LpTeee heaye fe Saath - Amend eat of Sele —Lepresen inten ioe ca ussse.| oO as C08 Siw 7 Qh Adkeg unt, E CH ve Co unsel' On ~, Codwsel be (leet on him ad Ais (Lea ht to self — Le par SeastnH ro) Agbitraaly — +4 Ken)?

8. Does pethwere have the Poctr Amendment eight to [reeaty?

9. Does Litronmere an 0 the. Lotectron J we) self. ic (owe koran en qr U.S, usr 5th pyrene

10. Shell te Disteee+ coir have gen Pe fone AN © pren -/4 amencl ht: aul / lem ying them 9 (Greemeamans)?

11. Should He CouctT of AEP ERS Nave a tected tle. Dxsmecl Covet" -fo fld ress the com @ lat basght— 94 the. fobtynee on the Ment?

12. Ale +here, aay Rights that fefhwe eos aS A Owivep STATES cHize?

13. Coes bhnere have A (LE. COURSR. '+ his ecco dom fnew tepaisms/ nmenismende Be Chuestiony (2] G4)?

14. Ate the loner CGuaty CORR iy Statug had . Tre STATE or TEKAL io CAM Ot be held [table for Py) eS Suffered by efi roneg ¢ FroecteD oe SleNenih jnosdhent-?

15. ES Te tote sre lelleens Foleo — Rpk ts wok an entity that Can be suep aS Clamed bp te Ckeur— (ORE denuyhts his Claim?

16.

Whether petitioner has a right to have his allegations disputed by respondents