No. 22-7080
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process exculpatory-evidence federal-habeas federal-rights malicious-prosecution state-misconduct wrongful-conviction
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration Privacy
DueProcess Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether actually, factually, truthfully, innocent Petitioner should be granted relief when State convicted against all exonerating evidence with malice, evil intent, and callous indifference to the truth/federally protected rights of Petitioner.
Any/all other questions apparent upon Statement Of The Case and establishment of complete record.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an innocent petitioner should be granted relief when the state convicted against exonerating evidence with malice and indifference
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-14
Waiver of right of respondent Connecticut to respond filed.
2023-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Connecticut
James A.
James Aho — Petitioner