WHETHER THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO RELEASE FROM INVOLUNITARY DETENTION
FROM THE CARE,CUSTODY AND TREATMENT OF THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES TREATMENT AND DETENTION FACILITY PURSUANT TO THE ILLINOIS SEXUAL
725 ILCS 207/1 et seq. WHERE THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN
PENDING SINCE JUNE 26,2012 WITH NO CIVIL COMMITMENT HEARING IN VIOLATION
OF SIXTH AMENDMENT, WHICH PROTECTS BASIC DEMANDS 1). TO PREVENT UNDUE AND
OPPRESSIVE INCARCERATION PRIOR TO A CIVIL COMMITMENT HEARING,AND 2). TO
MINIMIZE ANXIETY AND CONCERN ACCOMPANYING PUBLIC ACCUSATIONS AND 3). TO
LIMIT THE POSSOBILITIES THAT LONG DELAY WOULD MEAN LOSS OF JOBS,DISRUPTS
FAMILY LIFE,IT ENFORCES IDLENESS ,HINDERED GATHERING OF EVIDENCE, TO CONTACT
WITNESSES OR TO PREPARE THE PETITIONER'S DEFENSE. 'VIOLENT PERSONS ACT

WHERE THE COURTS OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT APPELLATE
UNITED STATES DIS-^ COURT OF ILLINOIS,THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT AND THE
TRICT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS HAVE FAILED OR REFUSE TO ADDRESS
THIS MOST HONORABLE SUPREME COURT'S RULING IN THE MATTER OF BARKER V.
WINGO 407. U. S.532,92 S.Ct. 2182 TO CONDUCT AND ACCOUNT FOR THE TIME TOWARD
A ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DAY SPEEDY TRIAL DEMAND (120-DAY) , PETITIONER
THOMAS POWERS HAS BEEN DETAINED WITHOUT A CIVIL COMMITMENT HEARING SINCE
JUNE 26,2012 (GOING ON TO ELEVEN YEARS) WITH THE PREJUDICE IS GREAT IN
VIOLATION OF THE

WHERE NOW THE SEVENTH/CIRCUIT REFUSED TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER BASED ON
"JURISDICTION"UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OF THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH
AMENDMENTS .

Whether the petitioner is entitled to release from involuntary detention