No. 22-7040
Michael Lee Gordon v. Doe, Designation Sentence Computation Center Official, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-review bias civil-procedure constitutional-review due-process judicial-discretion legal-procedure recusal standing statutory-interpretation witness
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I) whether the district court erred in denying Appellant's motion for the judge recusal based upon the Judge being called upon in the instant case as a witness
II) whether the district court erred in denying Appellant in proceed to forma Pauperis under the imminent danger of serious physical injury vatdoxa
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying Appellant's motion for recusal of the district court judge based on the judge's bias as a witness in the instant case
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-03-20
Motion (22M83) for leave to file a petiton for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2023-03-01
MOTION (22M83) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2022-08-26
Motion (22M83) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2022-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 19, 2023)
Attorneys
Michael Lee Gordon
Michael Lee Gordon — Petitioner