No. 22-7034
Earnest Gibson, IV v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law campus direct-supervision medical-treatment medicare-regulations off-site off-site-facility physician-oversight remote-location satellite-facility
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether pursuant to Medicare regulations defining the terms "off-site," "campus," "remote location," and "satellite facility," established that Petitioner's PHP was not operation in violation of Medicare's requirement that treatment must have occurred under a licensed physicians "direct supervision"?
Whether the appellate court's opinion denying COA was in error pursuant to Strickland v. Washington and Slack v. McDaniel?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's PHP was in violation of Medicare's requirement that treatment must have occurred under a licensed physician's direct supervision?
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Earnest Gibson, IV
Earnest Gibson IV — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent