No. 22-7026

Erin F. Graham, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: co-defendant confrontation-clause criminal-offense criminal-procedure domestic-incident hearsay hearsay-statements law-enforcement ongoing-criminal-offense
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Whether the introduction of a co-defendant's inculpatory hearsay statements about her alleged co-conspirator, made to law enforcement following a domestic incident that police had under control, violated the Confrontation Clause when the Government introduced the statements in the trial for a different ongoing alleged criminal offense that continued well beyond the completed domestic incident?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the introduction of a co-defendant's inculpatory hearsay statements violated the Confrontation Clause

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)
2023-01-03
Application (22A569) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until March 13, 2023.
2022-12-19
Application (22A569) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 26, 2023 to March 13, 2023, submitted to Justice Barrett.

Attorneys

Erin Graham, Jr.
Adam Clay StevensonUniversity of Wisconsin Law School, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent