No. 22-702

Joseph D. Rued v. Catrina M. Rued

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2023-01-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: child-abuse child-custody due-process evidence family-law judicial-discretion sexual-abuse standard-of-review therapist-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-03-31
Question Presented (from Petition)

Without a full presentation of the facts, did the District Court's affirmative conclusion that sexual abuse had not occurred deny due process to both Joseph Rued and his child.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court's affirmative conclusion that sexual abuse did not occur denied due process to the father and child

Docket Entries

2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2022-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 27, 2023)

Attorneys

Joseph D. Rued
William J. MauzyMauzy Law Office, P.A., Petitioner