No. 22-701
Norman Bartsch Herterich v. Mary E. Wiss, et al.
Relisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review claims-and-issues constitutional-violations district-court federal-constitutional-violations federal-district-court-jurisdiction federal-jurisdiction rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-adjudication state-court-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-05-25
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars federal district-court jurisdiction over an action merely because the action alleges federal Constitutional violations "arising from " state-court proceedings, where the claims and issues presented to the federal district court for adjudication have not been adjudicated by state courts.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars federal-district-court jurisdiction over an action merely because the action alleges federal-constitutional-violations arising-from state-court-proceedings, where the claims-and-issues presented to the federal-district-court for adjudication have not been adjudicated by state-courts
Docket Entries
2023-05-30
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-04-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Norman Bartsch Herterich
Norman Bartsch Herterich — Petitioner