No. 22-6985
Lisa Bergman v. Jeremy Howard, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-right criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process expert-testimony expert-witness prosecution-evidence right-to-counsel scientific-evidence scientific-expert
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Due Process Clause requires an impoverished criminal defendant to be appointed a scientific expert that is essential to confront scientific expert analysis used by the prosecution in its case in-chief.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause requires an impoverished criminal defendant to be appointed a scientific expert that is essential to confront scientific expert analysis used by the prosecution in its case-in-chief
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-04-06
Waiver of right of respondent Jeremy Howard, Warden to respond filed.
2023-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Jeremy Howard, Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Lisa Bergman
Benton C. Martin — Federal Community Defender, Petitioner