No. 22-6967
Arnoldo Antonio Garcia v. Afod Valdez, et al.
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts bivens-claim civil-detainee civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction government-liability ninth-circuit
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit err in an of issue of nationwide importance, and erroneously dismissed a meritorious Appeal, despite the fact that Petitioner pleaded a meritorious claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 29 L. Ed. 2d 619, 91 S. Ct. 199 (1971)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit err in dismissing a meritorious Bivens claim of nationwide importance?
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2023)
Attorneys
Arnoldo Antonio Garcia
Arnoldo Antonio Garcia — Petitioner
Valdez, Afod, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent