Why didn't any of the previous courts made no mention our deeded property?.

The main issue is that Ellington @Wachesaw East Plantation sold our property without consent and failed to compensate us with a fair and reasonable amount that could have settled this issue long ago. What makes this resort think that they can collect from 21 years of maintenance fees, renovation fees assessment fees, exchange feesour us over etc. and when they decide to sell our property for 9million plus we would accept this small check in return. We bpught this property as a nest egg to turn to when we got older. We agreed to buy this property because of the statement it would last us for the rest of our life with a claus of "survivorship" as long as we kept up with all the dues and fees that the resort would request.This never happened

If our case is denied for its worth it would jeopardize all future owners of properties with legally certified deeds. It would set a president that any time any large resort or organzation with prestige and money could come and take anyones property at any time without legally purchasing it from its original owner without their knowledge and consent.

Equally important for review is the Homeowners currently having a claus that as long as their workers with the resorts work with them in another state although they live in a different state them are exempt from not living in the state that the owners live. All of my respondents live in North Carolina and we live in South Carolina, Therefore I failed to prove that they live across state lines while doing business with us.

Why didn't any of the previous courts made no mention our deeded property?