No. 22-6948
Robert E. Spiker v. Robert E. Erskines, et al.
IFP
Tags: cell-phone-data constitutional-claims deliberate-indifference digital-privacy federal-jurisdiction fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-jurisprudence habeas-corpus medical-care prisoner-rights privacy search-and-seizure
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Neither the Overruled court nor the State Supreme Court of Appeals lacks a Post of Docket to the court by not Providing a Full Litigation Without Judicial Appeal and have been on 76, on hold zal for Paliliedurs clow of ziakh oaw2ddwad! 2a s4bibu hon wl eee For. 2 DiVvA a2 or Dezddly, Forza, Dalibartle ihdivtaradee oF Sareonus Mezdicd
Aoora andar FaMitle AnicilN WMalhiadd adc 2h der la Peisower ak udibed shale Panidadlury - Floredee
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government's warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Robert E. Spiker
Robert E. Spiker — Petitioner