No. 22-6934
Jack V. Smalley v. United States
Tags: batson-challenge batson-claim comparative-juror-analysis discrimination discriminatory-purpose due-process jury-selection peremptory-challenge voir-dire
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a comparative-juror analysis on a Batson claim depend on the reasons a party actually gave for exercising a peremptory challenge, or does it extend as well to reasons that could have been given or that a party might have offered on questioning by a trial court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a comparative-juror analysis on a Batson claim depend on the reasons a party actually gave for exercising a peremptory challenge, or does it extend as well to reasons that could have been given or that a party might have offered on questioning by a trial court?
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-06
Motion (22M75) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2023-02-15
MOTION (22M75) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-06
Motion (22M75) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2023-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Jack V. Smalley
Howard A. Pincus — Fed Pub. Def. for Dist. CO &WY, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent