No. 22-6933

John Hessmer v. Robert Bryan, Sheriff, Wilson County, Tennessee

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-misconduct judicial-review ninth-circuit statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

SHOUD THE=SIXTH CIRCUTT BE to COVERUP JWDGE CRENSHALLS VIOLATIONS OP SICTH CRCUIT $ SUPREME COURT STANDINPRECIDENTS OF EXLEPTIONS TO THE YOUNFER & MIDDLESEX DOCTRINES B4 INTENTIONALLY MAKING ABSTENTION A JUDICLAL CONSTRUCTION OF FAILURE TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE THE SIXTH CIRCUIT BOTH INTENTIONALLY OVERLOOKED AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION =oR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IN FORMA PAUPERIS.. AND NEVEL GIVINL NOTICE OF THE CIRCUIT'S INTENT TO DISMISS A MERITORIOUS SNTH BECAUSTE THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UUAS APPEAL. SA UW N NAINN TUNOLNEN CERTIFICATE OF APPEALATBILITY, LOIICH IN FOR MINTENTIONAL" DENIAL OF ACCESS TO FACT IS AN THE COURTS OF A MERTTORIOUS APPEAL OF "EQUAL PROTECTION OF FEDERAL LAU DENLAL OF 3 DISTRICT JUDGE CRENSHALO:

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Circuit should be allowed to cover up Judge Crenshaw's violations of Sixth Circuit and Supreme Court precedents by intentionally misconstruing failure to prosecute and overlooking an in forma pauperis application for certificate of appealability

Docket Entries

2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2022-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2023)

Attorneys

John Hessmer
John Hessmer — Petitioner