Question Presented (from Petition)
Petitioner's Rule 60(b)(4)(5) motion was unconstitutionally treated as a successive habeas application, denying equal protection of the law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent Brent Fluke, Warden to respond filed.
2022-10-27
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Brent Fluke, Warden
In Re Garland Ray Gregory, Jr.
Garland Ray Gregory Jr. — Petitioner