The questions before this Court is asked with impartialities on whether it can be presumed given the facts underlined in this writ, that if a petitioner presents evidence of a Constitutional Violation so strong that no state or federal court can have confidence in the outcome of a jury trial that was free of non-harmless constitutional error, by which a petitioner, will be allowed to pass through this Court's Writ of Certiorari gateway and argue the merits of his underlying Constitutional claim or questions raised that the State of Michigan have refused to so on the merits which constitutes, cruel and unusual punishment under both our Federal and State Constitutions, then balance and impartiality must exist when determining whether to grant or deny this writ? This Writ of Certiorari involves only claim one regarding subject matter jurisdiction and two questions raised therein:

1. Following an election and taking the office as a District Court Judge, did Judge Jeffrey C. Middleton violate the code of judicial misconduct by continuing his practice as an Attorney for the State of Michigan in the Petitioner's case? And;

What would establish a jury trial as being unconstitutionally assembled without the benefit of a prosecuting attorney from the State of Michigan, where Judge Jeffrey C. Middleton violate the code of judicial misconduct by representing himself as an attorney for the State of Michigan, at trial, in the Petitioner's case after being elected as a judge?

Whether a petitioner can pass through the Court's Writ of Certiorari gateway and argue the merits of an underlying constitutional claim when the petitioner presents evidence of a constitutional violation so strong that no state or federal court can have confidence in the outcome of a jury trial that was free of non-harmless constitutional error