1. Is the failure of a District Court and a United States Court
of Appeals to order instant dismissal of the immediate case
for lack of Article III Standing a sufficient type of
extraordinary circumstance to compel correction by Mandamus?

2. What gives the lower Courts of the Territories the authority
to dismiss their duty to establish Article III Standing?

3. Is Petitioner correct in claiming that His Due Process was
negated?

Is the failure of a District Court and a United States Court of Appeals to order instant dismissal of the immediate case for lack of Article III Standing a sufficient type of extraordinary circumstance to compel correction by Mandamus?