No. 22-6918
Ralph Hall v. Darwin LeClaire, et al.
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment administrative-law agency-decision appellate-review civil-rights contempt counsel due-process incarceration judicial-review procedural-due-process statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE WRONGFUL CONVICTION AND SENTENCE REVIEW OF PRO-SE PLEADINGS WERE SELECTIVE RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED REVIEW BARRIER THE CIRCUIT COURT PLEADINGS BE
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to counsel and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment require the appointment of counsel for indigent defendants in civil contempt proceedings that may result in incarceration
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2022-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Ralph Hall
Ralph Hall — Petitioner