No. 22-6913

In Re Robert B. Read, Jr.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure ex-post-facto habeas-corpus rules-of-evidence sixth-amendment speedy-trial subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2023-03-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Did the United States Constitution allow the trial court implied subject-matter jurisdiction to try Petitioner for the indicted Felony One Offense?

2) Did the Collin County, Texas - 366th Judicial District Court deprive Petitioner Read of his sixth Ammendment Right, as guaranteed by the United States Constitution, to compel witnesses in his favor under the "Plain Error" Rule?

3) Did the Collin County, Texas - 366th Judicial District Court violate Petitioner Read's right to a Speedy Trial for all indicted charges by operation of law?

4) Did the Collin County - 366th Judicial District Court abuse it's discretion by allowing the state to utilize Texas Rules of Evidence In violation of Ex Post Facto law (U.S. Constitution, Art. 1 Sec. §9) Resulting in harm & Prejudice to Petitioner (Defendant) Read?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial court have implied subject-matter jurisdiction to try the petitioner for the indicted felony offense?

Docket Entries

2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-01-19

Attorneys

Robert B. Read, Jr.
Robert B. Read, Jr. — Petitioner