No. 22-6912
Michael Wright v. J. Pickett, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency federal-court habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2023-03-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Can the Federal court deny a Certificate of Appealability on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel for his failure to raise a constitutional challenge to fhe sufficiency of the evidence
2. Can the Federal court deny a request for a Certificate of Appealability on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel for his failure to raise a challenge to the omission of an essential element of the offenses
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the Federal court deny a Certificate of Appealability on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel for his failure to raise a constitutional challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence
Docket Entries
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent J. Pickett, Warden to respond filed.
2023-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)
Attorneys
J. Pickett, Warden
Jill M. Thayer — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Michael Wright
Michael Wright — Petitioner