No. 22-6911
IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-defendant due-process extraordinary-circumstances pretrial-detainee standing state-law void-judgment
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the Petitioner entitled to benefit from existing state law and state
supreme court decisions that all clearly provide for a finding of VOID JUDGMENT
based upon undisputed and admitted facts that his civil rights were substantially
violated without any Due Process?
When the Government substantially violates the civil rights of a criminal
defendant (Pretrial Detainee) without Due Process, is the judgment of conviction
being sought, by law, void?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Petitioner entitled to benefit from existing state law and state supreme court decisions that all clearly provide for a finding of VOID JUDGMENT based upon undisputed and admitted facts that his civil-rights-were-substantially-violated-without-any-due-process
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2022-11-22
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)
Attorneys
In re: Cunningham
Bradly M. Cunningham — Petitioner