No. 22-6903

William Landry, Jr. v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2023-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation constitutional-rights due-process faretta-v-california fourteenth-amendment indigent-defense sixth-amendment speedy-trial state-constitution statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2023-04-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

"The Petitioner respectfully ask '* When the [Fjramers of the Oklahoma State Constitution, created and enacted Article I. £ 3. [Unappropriatedpublic lands - - Indian Lands - - Jurisdiction of United States], did the State of Oklahoma and/or its Official(s) "forevef1. disclaim and/or waive jurisdiction within Indian Country?

"The Petitioner respectfully ask "'- [Although the Petitioner is Native], is Mace a critical element in criminal proceeding(s) within the State of Oklahoma? Or will this destroy a2. century of justice reform and the abolishment of racism within our Jurisprudence !

"The Petitioner respectfully ask '1- What Congressional Law/Statute grants Oklahoma "concurrent jurisdiction " within Indian Country, found within the borders of the State of3. Oklahoma?

May any State or Territory create, enact or enforce 6 any penal statute or constitutional provision in CONTUMACY of the Sixth Amendment right to a Speedy Trial ?

What is the "time limit" of a Speedy Trial in a State 7 criminal proceeding? More so when the state fails 5. to have a time limit for a Speedy Trial 8.

The Petitioner is challenging the constitutionality of the State of Oklahoma 's penal statute(s) and constitutional 9 provision(s) governing the time limits of Speedy Trial, [from the fling of information to arraignment and trial\, \Title 22. Ch. 11 § 812.1 to 812. IT, Title 22. Ch. 1 § 13 and Oklahoma Constitution. Article II $ 2010].

The Petitioner is challenging the CONSTITUTIONALITY of the Oklahoma Public Defender 's11, POLICY AND PROCEDURES.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Oklahoma's State Constitution Article II § 20 violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments by failing to contain the language of the Speedy Trial Act

Docket Entries

2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-01-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)

Attorneys

William Landry
William Landry — Petitioner