1. Whether the "will overborne" standard or analysis, which requires the finding of Violence, or threats of Violence, dumbfounding a person's will, should be used to evaluate the Voluntariness of A Confession obtained by means of trickery and deception, tactics which do not involve the use of coercion or threats to overturn a person's will.

2. What exactly must the federal habeas court do when required the required "independent review" on Issues of Voluntariness of a Confession under the Constitution of Mccreary, Fenton, and U.S.C.A(d) (§§).

3. Whether intercepting and recording a persons Cellphone Conversation by a stick feoffor the purpose of discovering Wimirafrng evidence Constitute a body Search and secure of the Cellphone User.

4. Whether a person making a Cellphone Call has a reasonable expectation of privacy and whether his or her expectation of privacy during the Call can be Vicariously Waived or denied by the Consent of A single Oflent who is A party to the Call.

5. Should the test for determining when the Counsel right derives be centered more on When the aid of Counsel is most needed rather than Solely based on the Custody and indictment fections.

6. Whether the COh standard used by the 9th Circuit Court of appeals in this Case, departed from the Orders established by this Court in Miller-El V Cockrell 537 U.S. 322(2003).

Whether the 'will overborne' standard or analysis should be used to evaluate the voluntariness of a confession obtained by trickery and deception