No. 22-6897
Ruben Hernandez-Correa v. United States
Tags: alleyne almendarez-torres appellate-procedure apprendi certiorari constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-interpretation precedent sentencing supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183)
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-31
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-04-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 31, 2023.
2023-04-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 1, 2023.
2023-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2023 to May 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 31, 2023)
Attorneys
Ruben Hernandez-Correa
Judy Fulmer Madewell — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent