Sleven Audett, had an active, on tine, nonfuirleres, ptogesseng Janagan, in the U.S djdited the Hoable u Soie Case5:17-CTH2 Distid, Easten Distict of North Cavlina Constitutional by the District Pri de litigont was refused begal epesentation begal represent nonths Case# 5:21- CT- 03245-M. Chinf Judge Richord E, Meyes ble I ectue, on but it was exact same Case; Dame eidene, Nefiled, (inden fudye I lanagan), bat was dimisod with pejudie gresting C/tH n a on t md R ex (due to Pw de btegant mistake), should not have been cham shoed have been soctiwated bosed on mesite of the mited pesented rout. O is the exoct Dame case Dame Tots, same Constitutional nilat ne meits and worthy of hi by fy sniged b Honae Louise Jlanogan. and Toits to be levogniged and er anther Gudyo in Aa imed by oe Judge then ged and dimisd by This negates ut, and that "enoiDuppanted by epels Crnt. all of Pettlines viable lawsint has them, as if they ho longes exist on matter because oe a Po do tochnical mistake

Whether the Eleventh Amendment bars a federal court from exercising jurisdiction over a state official in his official capacity when the plaintiff seeks only prospective injunctive relief to end an ongoing violation of federal law