Whether the District Court and Court of Appeals Abused there
Discretion on its Original and Supplemental Jurisdiction by an
erroneous application of Section 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) on Earls
Constitutional Claims by not considering those claims in a
42 U.S. C. § 1983 petition.

Whether the United States District Court Abused it's Discretion
by denying Earls 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Complaint at the
Screening Stage of the process for failure to State a Claim, when
a Constitutional Claim with Evidence was presented where the defendants
violated.

Whether the United States District Court erroneously applied the
Law pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and denied Earls his
Right to pursue a Civil Rights Claim.

Whether the District Court and Court of Appeals abused their discretion on jurisdiction and erroneous application of 28-usc-1367(c)(3) on constitutional-claims,whether the District Court abused discretion by denying 42-usc-1983 complaint at screening stage,whether the District Court erroneously applied 28-usc-1915 and denied right to pursue civil-rights-claim