No. 22-6878
Roger Keith Lunsford v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: collateral-attack constitutional-rights criminal-procedure district-court double-jeopardy due-process federal-prosecution habeas-corpus hearing-requirement legal-relief
Latest Conference:
2023-03-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
IX. Could Whe Stole Violate A Defendants Subshant! Ve
And Procedural Right To Due Recess So
Earegiously That Lt Would Bar A Future Federal,
Rosecution ?
T. Does 28 U.S.C. 2255 Requive The Distvicdh Court
To Grant WN Rompt Hearing Where "The Files find
Records Do Nol Contodicy A Defendants Clarins
Tor Relief ¢
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Could the theft of a defendant's substantive and procedural right to due process be so egregious that it would bar a future federal prosecution?
Docket Entries
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Roger Lunsford
Roger Keith Lunsford — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent