No. 22-6871
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing speedy-trial
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
I' Ktd Ti-cp&flc 7«e^ i*<&eQJK fitfi'TiVnif-U)ke*-e -fie pYaSsCvT^r osA«u w-
\ahtti tLcr wVTW Wooy <W c^i^<s (xwa/,yer dlibyij
'f'L) cuzfioa J
kofru#/ /)^{ooj; ~th__ (vVif CbuHf cko<tfJ~ti(l Ibfe^oH 7^ ^ r
2?w«>i -He^efrtT Soffttiai br'lejpfy-Su^ olv¥
jfaytf lV\C?(Ldfjte_ TC&T/'V* o"y f/iy* (gyppl^M
A' ./ iU ji/Vy OXJUI IfaJ pefiTfofit^Ojp-orx- Q**T * -f ^ C<°/
OV'dy 6o«if f^aJw g^'cUy
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the prosecutor's acknowledgment that the petitioner was merely charged with felony and misdemeanor charges, but not convicted, should have precluded the prosecutor from seeking such a substantial punishment
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent St. Lawrence County District Attorney's Office to respond filed.
2023-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2023)
Attorneys
Ahmed Khalil
Ahmed Khalil — Petitioner
St. Lawrence County District Attorney's Office