No. 22-6848
Maurice Daniels v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights commerce-interference criminal-obstruction due-process federal-law federal-revised-code free-speech hobbs-act public-corruption standing threats-of-violence vagueness
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Hobbs Act's prohibition on interference with commerce by threats or violence is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts of this case
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Maurice Daniels
Maurice Daniels — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent